
Earlier this week, when I decided to entertain the topic of how married men process the fact a close friend is getting divorced, I thought of several films I've seen over the years featuring orphans. Stay with me.
Have you ever watched an orphan movie? And I don't mean the time you acted as a benevolent soul and took home that straight-to-video joint starring Vivica Fox and Eddie Winslow from 'Family Matters.' You remember. The one that no one else was willing to take a chance on and upon wasting one hour and 42 minutes of your weekend, you didn't know whether to pat yourself on the back for blindly supporting black cinema or smack yourself in the face.
Granted, it was charitable of you and your family to take home an unwanted movie, but that's a different type of orphan movie, one abandoned by the studio system and the public. I'm referring to real orphan movies with the cliche villainous nuns, bloody British accents, the whole nine. But it's another cliche also found in all orphan movies that's applicable to the subject of men, friends and divorce.
Think of the long-faced kid, hands firmly pressed against the window, as he watches his friend -hell, maybe his brother -be whisked away in the backseat of a nondescript family sedan. As the kid mourns the loss of his running mate, he wishes that he, too, was in the car. And there it is: That's the way the average married man feels when he's informed that his buddy is separating from his wife -like an orphan waiting for his turn to be picked up.
Days will pass, but the feeling of being left behind won't. Caught daydreaming, his wife will call to him and ask, "Honey, what are you doing?" as he blankly stares through the metaphorical window waving goodbye to his emancipated friend. He'll snap out of it and reply, "Nothing, babe, nothing." He'll then find himself rubbing her feet as she goes on about her long day only to trample on the moment by blurting out, "So what the hell happened to that foot massager I bought you from Brookstone anyway?" And that's how the fight started.
The grass is greener on the other side. Men are interminably hopeless that way. No matter how good we have it at home -at least for those of us who have it good at home, because some men have it really bad (I mean really, really bad). I'm straying. No matter how good we have it at home, we think we want something different and, if not different, something more.
Deep down, embedded in our subconscious, we long for a harem of women that will serve our guiltiest of pleasures with the caveat that we don't have to pay for their health insurance, their car note, their meals or their toothpaste. We want to get our 'Charlie Sheen' on, minus the increasingly creepy antics and the high beams he traded in for his eyeballs. "Give us free!"
The point is that men, especially those of us who are married, are never satisfied. We forget why we got married. Of course, love is a big part of the equation -at least it should be. But there are also self-serving reasons. Many of us marry so that we have someone to save us from ourselves. We're creatures of self-destruction. We know this because we're self-aware creatures of self-destruction. We break things.
Yet when a buddy announces his divorce it's like an avalanche of envy falls on our heads. "What? You're getting paroled? I wish I could come with you. Write me letters and let me know what it's like out there. Tell me everything." In that moment, both parolee and lifer oblivious to the high marital recidivism rate. He'll be back.
Eventually, his friend realizes he's been inside so long. He's not equipped or prepared for the outside world, the single life. Sure, the idea was exciting at first. But then he finds himself perusing the pages of dating sites as if he were shopping on human eBay. He begins to yearn for the type of stability he once had. It's the delusional circle of life; we always over-romanticize what we once had, yet voluntarily let go.
So, in the end, it all balances out. Besides, porridge is served dinner is ready. The husband left behind steps away from the window and back into his not-so-bad reality. Damned if we do, damned if we don't.

Mason Jamal writes about men, women and popular culture. For more of his musings, visit masonjamal.com. To have his commentary delivered to your e-mail, subscribe here. Keep up with Mason's daily thoughts and observations by following him on Twitter @masonsays.


Comments: (25)
Add a comment
By: bed5d0e on 3/10/2011 9:37AM
This has got to be the stupidest thing I've ever read on Black Voices. I'm not even sure I understand the point the writter is trying to make. "Til death do us part", what do you think that means? "The two will become one flesh", what do you think that mean? Y'all act like divorce is a good thing when all it does is send people to Hell.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Mason Jamal (author of the article) on 3/11/2011 9:36AM
Ahh, good old fire and brimstone. Who needs to explore the male psyche when you can just throw a Bible at his head? I'm sure that we'll cure everything, maybe even the common cold. What was I thinking?
Report This
By: Tom on 3/10/2011 11:40AM
"Deep down, embedded in our subconscious, we long for a harem of women that will serve our guiltiest of pleasures with the caveat that we don't have to pay for their health insurance, their car note, their meals or their toothpaste."
Ha! Speak for yourself. We men need to adjust our behavioral programming for the times. Womyn—and yes, I'm using feminophonics for a reason—haven't been interested in pleasing or assisting men in any way since around when the sun set on the British Empire. The principal focus of hetero relations, and law, for the past 60+ years is resource extraction from males. Ask any divorced man if you doubt.
In an age when marrying one wommun is a recipe for poverty, keeping a harem must be recipe for implosion. Good luck with all the liabilities attached to your fantasy sir. You'll need it.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Mason Jamal (author of the article) on 3/11/2011 9:35AM
You did read the entire article right? But if you enjoy taking one passage out of context and parading it around as if it represents the full body of thought, you should apply for a position with Fox News. Thanks for reading though.
Report This
By: tratney on 3/10/2011 11:50AM
In the article, the writer says as it relates to the male species that "Many of us marry so that we have someone to save us from ourselves. We're creatures of self-destruction. We know this because we're self-aware creatures of self-destruction. We break things", with the problem being with this is that your are looking for a mother and not a lover and partner, something that could eventually cause you to look outside once you realize that you are now being overburden with parental overseeing. Something not only referenced in my book "I May Not Know What I'm Talking About But I'm Gonna Say It Anyway" but in Kelly Price's new single with Stokley from Mint Condition where she has to set the brothers straight. Maybe if you men would up instead of looking for someone to save you from yourself you would be more content in your marriages with you not thinking that you're missing out on something because when you got married you'd have already put your little boy toys and games down. Oh by the way my book is available on Xlibris.com, amazon.com, and Barnes and Noble online. Get it
read it and marinade on it.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Apostle James Winfree on 3/10/2011 3:02PM
King Jesus Said I Got It Right!
King Jesus Commanded Me To Put His Blessed And Awesome Name On His Believers The Church.... Numbers 6:27,- Isaiah 9:6,7,- Isaiah 52:5-7,- Zechariah 14:9,- Luke 24:47,- Acts 2:38 King Jesus Will Not Take No For An Answer His Loving Name Goes On All And Everyone And Everything!!!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Roscoe Jenkins on 3/11/2011 1:57AM
Brother Jamal,
You have hit the proverbial nail on the head.
Most married men cannot or dare not be as blatantly be as honest as you have been in this article, as they fear repercussions from their wives.
We live in a society where men are consistently being emasculated, or worse yet emasculating themselves for a trade-off of some temporary or imagined benefit.
It is a rare woman that will allow her man to be a "man". When this does occur, it eliminates any desire to wander or as you so elegantly write...."feel like an orphan waiting his turn to be picked up."
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Mason Jamal (author of the article) on 3/11/2011 9:48AM
Thank you kindly Roscoe Jenkins.
Report This
By: Pepyone on 3/11/2011 2:09PM
We are not rare to find. We are just rare to be treated like the centerpiece and not the dishrag. The need for a harem seems to be more commonplace with online dating and women silly enough to think a text message equates to love.
And just remember, the grass is not always greener on the other side, everytime I turned it over, I just found some dirt and roots (baggage dugged deep in the pockets)!!!
Report This
By: nettiad on 3/10/2011 11:09PM
Really? What did u just say? This has got to be the most unintelligent article that I've read. I'm just going to leave it at that.
Reply to this Comment | Report This