
-Jeni
Train him! It's obvious he is a novice, and just as you had to be potty trained to use a toilet, this boy needs to be love trained to know how you want to be loved. At the inception of any new relationship, couples have to learn how to fulfill each others needs, wants, and desires, but this can't be done without clear communication. What we forget to utilize though, is our physical communication. You don't know what he likes or dislikes until he tells you, or physically gives you a sign--a contorted face and spitting out of food sends the message that something is rotten. You have unreasonable expectations, because you are asking someone who hasn't learnt how to crawl to go run a marathon. Cut him some slack and recognize that this is a great opportunity to get exactly what you need in a relationship. It will take time, patience, creativity, and the use of both verbal and physical communication, but the rewards will be great.
First, understand that training is not a bad word. As human beings we are trained to function in the world everyday. If you hold your arm out in the street in NYC, a cab driver will pull over to pick you up. You've been trained to hail, and the cab driver has been trained to recognize that physical cue and responds by pulling over. Embrace training. Second, training is not bossing. Don't boss your man around, and make sure to release any feelings of superiority you may have surrounding his lack of experience in relationships. Approach him as if he is an inexperienced swimmer who needs to be taught the butterfly.
You need to lead him through the approximations of expressing love the way you want it. Essentially, be specific and tell him your needs using baby steps. When you walk through the door of his home, tell him "I'm really thirsty. Can you grab me a glass of water please?" When he brings it back, give him a kiss or a hug and say "Thank you. You are the best". This is positive reinforcement for the action you want him to do. Do this over and over until he is trained, and automatically starts offering or just bringing you a glass each time you come in the door. Positive reinforcement is a great tool to establish a behavior and make it stick. Ask for what you want and when he does it, give him a treat. Kind words of praise, a kiss or hug, his favorite food, or if he does something big, get him a gift. Whether you want a massage, breakfast in bed, cuddles, or chicken soup when your sick, apply the use of positive reinforcement to every behavior you want from him. His mind will link the action he does to the reward he receives and he will automatically take pleasure in doing these things for you.
If you find that he isn't doing something you want, don't get angry or upset. In fact don't have any reaction to a behavior you don't like. Punishment doesn't work in relationships so huffing and puffing, or giving the silent treatment are ineffective ways to communicate what you want. Instead remain emotionless, and then keep your eyes peeled for behavior you do like and reinforce it.
You have the chance to help this young man grow into a loving, giving partner. Just as you were trained to kiss your mother when she looked you in the eye, puckered up and said "kiss, kiss", he too can be trained to be an exceptional lover.
Follow Brody on Twitter @LuvCoach
Rebecca Brody is a relationship coach and columnist in NYC. She hosts www.ImprovDates.com, and works with private clients. Send your questions to Brody@TheLuvCoach.com or visit her at www.TheLuvCoach.com.

Comments: (11)
Add a comment
By: Caregiver 1 on 1/28/2011 8:01PM
Hello to the letter writer and Ms. Brody. Respectfully, if you seek information on male issues, you should seek the input of a male. Female perspectives can only give you a glimpse of what a female expects or has been able to experience in prior circumstances. Not saying that is all bad or wrong, but rather that the dynamics of those relationships were different and there are obviously differing circustances now.
Perhaps the letter writer "Jeni", is relying on an often used perception of many women. Namely that "if he were 'really' into me, he should know what I want". Although it seems similar as Ms. Brody's premise, here is how it differs. The advice already given to you suggests that you "train" him in the ways you want him to respond. And eventhough I will admit that I find the term "train" offensive, I believe what should be suggested is for you to consider the relationship on its current merits because it represents the man he is now and what he feels comfortable being. If it does not work for you, excuse yourself from it. You admitted in your letter that you had to warm-up to this man and you feel that you "gave-in" after some number of months. I understand how some women enjoy the feeling of being pursued, followed by being caught-up in a wave of emotional intensity and surrendering to the feeling. But I submit that your "feeling" and reality is that you feel that you "settled" and now he is giving you positive reinforcement that you are now receiving "less" than what you feel you "deserve". You believe that a "real man" behaves differently and that you doubt not only his sincerity, but his ability to fulfill your expectations in the future as well. You seem to have a full slate of expectations of what a "real man" is like and how he should be in tune with you. This is evidenced by your usage of words like "clueless" and phrases like "make me happy". Both of these and other clues in your letter support my belief that your mental blueprint of an "ideal" relationship is firmly set and is trotted out and stood next to each potential mate. Perhaps this is because you are no longer the young naive woman you once were and have a heightened sense of urgency about selecting your mate. Proof of your age and frame of mind is suggested by your having a previous 5 year relationship and it not being described as a high school sweetheart or first love. It is further supported by your re-assessing this current situation at a 5 month juncture, meaning that you don't want to revisit the feeling of "wasting" your prime family building and nesting time.
Another issue is suggested by your comments on his hospitality in his home. You mention him fixing meals and noticing and inquiring about what "you" need and want. This supports that hybrid view that many women have adapted about roles in relationships. It is the "I make my own money, so don't expect me to behave like my mother or grandmother did" while still expecting the man to be chivalrous and display the attributes that your elders received. In this regard, you don't accept that times have changed, at least not where your wants and needs are concerned. You obviously feel that this kind of behavior is bedrock expectations from any man "worthy" of your company. I used the term worthy because it ties back to your having a mental blueprint for yourself what a suitable mate must have or do.
If you were really giving in this relationship and expecting to gain some support for your position based on your contributions to this relationship, you would have listed all of the things that you did for him. This would have "justified" your feelings of being shortchanged and more firmly established your victimship at the hands of this "clueless" man. But you did not list a single one on your behalf while listing several deficits on his part. You know that you believe that a woman should change her man to be what she "deserves" and Ms. Brody shares your sentiment as she suggested that this man is a clean slate or moist clay, ready to molded. Your and Ms. Brody's mindset is like that in the State Farm commercial where the black female is going on and on about her boyfriend backing into a car and then using the agent to transform her boyfriend into muscled, model. When he wishes for the same and she is transformed into a more attractive female, she exclaims "I was perfect the way I was". What I am trying to expose and explain is a common view that females display. One where the issues in the relationship can be laid at the feet of their partner or mate without any complicity on their part.
Consider approaching each relationship as a fresh start. One where you should be committed to giving as good as you expect to receive. You should also bring a completed, happy person to a relationship so your mate can benefit from the strength that you contribute and not suffer from deficits you seek to fill. The latter approach leads to both parties immediately and continuously assessing the relationship in terms of winning and losing or receiving vs. giving. A kind of serial victim analysis. Jeni this is not the man for you nor you the woman for him. It is possible that no man is for you at this time as you don't feel that you should bring much of anything to the table and that you expect a man to make you happy. People that are exceptional and special are recognized as such based of what they do or have done. Not just because they think so. Peace
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: karamel on 2/17/2011 12:59AM
I'm only going to disagree with the notion of chivalry playing a role. MOST PEOPLE, not by gender, mind you, are taught that the POLITE, not chivalrous, thing to do for a *guest* is to offer a drink or a meal. He may not see himself as a host or a guest, and many introverts, and he sounds like one, do not view people they are in *CLOSE* relationships with as guests or people the *have to* please in some *stereotypical* or *storybook* or even *etiquette book* way. Is he considerate in other ways? Does he let her do what she wants to do or suggest meals or dates and follow through on them? Or does he hog the remote or never go to her place because he doesn't feel like leaving his own?
If he is never blatantly selfish or controlling, I'd say that he just has a different idea of what's "considerate" than she does. He may be waiting for her to speak up or not really have a clue what it is she wants. As you alluded to, what she thinks is a sign of "love" may just be a sign of having been to cotillion...or having seen too many romantic movies.
Personally, I HATE red roses and BAD jewelry (think anything with tiny rubies or based on the shape of a heart--YUCK) and I would gag if any man brought me either at ANY point in the relationship. Don't worry. (I do a pretty good job of not looking or acting like I belong on The Bachelor, so he'd have to be pretty thick to think it would have much of a positive effect.) However, I wouldn't feel like he didn't respect me if he wasn't getting me a drink of water or cooking waffles 5 MONTHS into being exclusive. I'd feel like the weird manipulative part of whatever he considered courtship was over, and I'd probably be MORE comfortable once he's tailored his expectations of what "any" woman likes to be more in line with who I really am.
To give you a clue, the last guy I liked gave me a comic book and noticed that I wanted to learn to step, without me saying so and pulled me out on the floor to fake it. THAT melted my heart, but the last guy who cooked me breakfast and tried to buy me things got the boot after 3 weeks. But then, THAT guy also couldn't take "I'm busy hanging out with friends" or "I have to work" for an answer, either. He tried to dismiss *me* (yes, you read that right, and yes, in that order, and yes, LESS than 3 weeks in and not even on a date night...really) as "not relationship material" because he had grown so used to wrapping girls around his finger with his manipulative behavior that he thought that's what relationships looked like.
I hope he's with someone as counter-manipulative as he is manipulative...I'm pretty sure he is, as it seems to be what he was looking for and he's pretty relentless with people who *don't* tell him what they want, but manage to "coerce" him into it. (Really he's so dysfunctional that he can just never admit what he wants or accept it or ask for it without strings attached because he thinks he'd *look* like he was out of control to himself and everyone else)...I know this because he stalked me and kept me up on the minute details of his burgeoning new romance with someone else at the same time. He was spending EVERY night at her house and "worrying" aloud that *she* was getting too attached. She in turn, once she suddenly and accidentally became his girlfriend of course, made a loud, thinly-veiled accusation that I was trying to make a move on him (at work) while pretending not to know my name even though it was printed on a sheet in front of her with my picture on it. I'm DEAD serious...See? Manipulative and nutso. Good for him-- sounds like a match.
Moral of the story for the lady: read ALL of the behaviors, not just the ones you wish you were seeing or not seeing. Read them in context of who the other person is, (if not who both of you are together), but never just who you wish they were.
Report This
By: Marie Morrison on 2/19/2011 10:18AM
Well said Caregiver! I'm a woman and I agree with your comments entirely! 'Train him', 'a clean slate' how insulting! This is not a dog. This is a young man who is probably experiencing his first real 'crush' on an older female. Sounds like he can do better to me. He needs nurturing too...and I'm not talking about sleeping at his apartment, nor just having sex.
Report This
By: Justifyed on 1/28/2011 9:45PM
Train? What is he, a pet? How about, articulate to him what your needs are? And the same time, ask him what he expects out of this relationship?
Sounds like to me, the "trainer" is trying to make this man a carbon copy of the one she was in the relationship with. My question is, why would she want the same thing if that didn't work to begin with?
Here's is my suggestion: IF YOU WANT SOMETHING, ASK FOR IT!
If you are at his apartment and you want him to get you a drink, how about asking...'babe, can you bring me a drink'? or 'babe, will you make me some of your famous pancakes in the morning'?
I feel this "training" is going to backfire, as some of his buddies will eventually "school" him, (if he is as clueless as she says he is, the fellas will be hard on him, too) he will eventually leave for "greener grass" and she will be left alone, and waiting for thenext 'trainee'.
Unfortunately, the next one may not be as "clueless" and she will get her feelings hurt.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Isaiah Robertson on 1/29/2011 9:33AM
Men are not lions! We can't be trained or tamed. If a man is going to change, it's going to come through self-determination.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: DeAndre.Robinson@thehartford.com on 1/29/2011 11:57AM
Caregiver, you hit it right on nail right on the head. But i thought you were writing a book! Good info,tho. I just wanted to add maybe he wasn't raised that way. Maybe he has seen his mom do all of those things for his father and that's what he expects from you. So maybe its not him! Maybe it's your expectations that are far fetched to him and you get mad because he won't fetch you something to drink or breakfast! Maybe he likes your breakfast better than his own? She has way too many answers, but she seems to have forgotten to ask him the questions, which is typical of a woman who's been in a marriage/5year relationship. I hate to inform you, but by your letter it shows you may have missed a few lessons in your previous relationship, like what you expect ain't always what you gonna get. That's why the previous relationship ended! Hopefully she will relay what she wants and gets it! But like the old folks and strippers will tell you a closed mouth won't get feed or anything to drink!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: kieraht on 2/01/2011 11:16AM
Like it or not, people train others in how to treat them every day. Some are more effective than others. Don't trip over the word "train."
For some one who was in a 5 year relationship, I am surprised that Jeni doesn't know how to use her words better. No one is a mind reader. In her previous relationship her mate had time to learn her likes and dislikes. After being with her new guy, how can she expect him to know what it took 5 years for the other dude to learn?
Good advice Rebecca, though. By adjusting her behavior, Jeni will be able to help her man learn what she likes.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: stare k on 2/05/2011 1:55PM
Some time u can train / some time u cant
Neards makes the best fininacial husband & the most trusting, truthful one's.So who will take the
NEARD MAMA BOY ? The old saying if he treats his mom well ,he will do the same for you .
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: autirose on 2/05/2011 4:46PM
If she wanted "that type of man", she should have taken her time to get to know if he were the type she wanted before she became intimate with him. They were friends, first. She made the mistake most inexperienced females make, and males too. Subcoming to being attracted before proper reasonings sets in. Once in too late. He seemed to have gotten his desire fulfilled, why do all the things she deemed necessary when he could get "it" without havbing to do those things? I am very concerned about young women having sex with sooo many males, or females, before marriage. They may never marry, but will have slept with multiple men. Why abortion is so rampant. Something is wrong. Her values are called into question. I say get to know the family and how he was raised, can reveal his values. It seems to me if one cares for and respects the partner then doing actions to please should come naturally. A man knows to do this, if he pleases. To train a man sounds ridiculous. People are and express themselves differently. Maybe she should get to learn what makes him want to do that naturally, because "training" him sounds like "raising" him something his parents should have done. Is he too stupid to know how to express his love in a nonsexual way. Just my thoughts. A man doesn't like to be tricked, manipulated, "mama'd" by his partner. I think with experience, she'll get better at her choice of intimate partners. After all, they've dated only five months. I don't have the time and patience to "train" a man. Either he knows or he doesn't. She say they were friends, wasn't she aware of his ways. Recall the song' "Mama said, Son Take Time To Know Her." It works both ways.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Warren D on 2/05/2011 7:05PM
"Train him"?....Really. She needs either a dog, or a domesticated monkey - not a human being.Evidently her prior "trainee" came to his senses and bounced.Too many Black women have this very mentality of either "changing ' or "training" a man like some upright pet.And too many so-called men, in their desire to have these type of women -just lay down, roll over...whatever.Ironically,(but predictably) the women then despise these "carpets" and "rugs" for being such compliant, and punked-out wimps. Never fails.Then it's on to the next "trainee".And unfortunately, there's no shortage of desperate men willing to jump and dance when some woman says so.
Reply to this Comment | Report This